Half Sized Blog Element (Single Author Style)
Half Sized Blog Element (Multi Author Style)
Sambhaji Maharaj Biography
/0 Comments/in Biographies & Life Stories, Historical & Political Figures/by rathodkethan1@gmail.comSambhaji Maharaj, who did not convert even after being tortured and having his body cut into pieces

Sambhaji Maharaj Chhaava movie
For 9 years, Sambhaji Maharaj also fought like his father. This film Chava is based on the life of the second ruler of the Maratha Empire. So the son of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj is doing well at the box office.
In this, Vicky Kaushal’s performance brings the character of Shambhaji to life. Greatly, Director Laxman Utekar made this film to touch the hearts of the audience. This film has also received critical acclaim and praise on social media.
Sambhaji maharaj converted into Islam ?
So Shambhaji led many military campaigns. The most important of which was the attack on Burhanpur under the Mughal rule. Then he rejected Aurangzeb’s offer to leave him if he converted to Hinduism. But he preferred to sacrifice his life for Hinduism. He refused to back down even in adverse situations.
Now, Shambhaji was also a researcher. While fighting tirelessly to save the kingdom, on the other hand. Here he became proficient in several languages. So much so, he gave priority to education and science.
Sambhaji Maharaj strength
A lot—we can learn a great deal from his innovative war strategies and leadership. Adhering to the ideology he believed in, the sacrifices he made for the people. And the loyalty he showed to them is indescribable.
Above all, his determination, discipline, and self-reliance remain an inspiration to today’s generation. His life shows that true strength lies not in power alone. But in personality and perseverance.
Aurangazeb dream to Islam India
Being king, Aurangzeb’s dream was to convert Hindu India into an Islamic country. Many people had tried this before him. They did not succeed. Mostly, Shaista Khan, Diler Khan, Dawood Khan, Mahabat Khan, and Bahadur Khan—Marathas defeated all his brave soldiers and subedars.
Hundreds of soldiers and chieftains died in various battles. 50–60 thousand soldiers died. So the Marathas/British/East India Company destroyed the prestige of the Delhi-Mughal empire. Finely, Aurangzeb himself thought of going to the south many times.But he refrained from it due to fear for his life (security issue).
Sambhaji Maharaj maintain Hind Swaraj
During Shivaji’s presence, he trembled with fear. Then, defeat, he thought, would cost him his honor. With the death of Shivaji in 1680, the fear disappeared. A good opportunity came.
For a long time, Shivaji consolidated Hindu Swaraj and gained great prestige. In this race, Shambhaji could not maintain it well. But Shivaji brought great honor to the Hindu throne. Shambhaji earned a reputation as a great warrior.
Sambhaji maharaj protest women

His whole life, Shambhaji showed his anger to the Mughal rulers. And he fiercely defended Hindu women against Mughal atrocities. So he took the responsibility of saving the honor and lives of Hindu women. Mostly those who were facing severe troubles due to the Mughals.
None of Aurangzeb’s chieftains and soldiers came forward to confront Shambhaji. Such was the valor of Shambhaji. Aurangzeb asked his eldest son to go and attack Shambhaji.
What happened to Aurangazeb son?
Here he conditioned that Amir Khan must accompany the army to Afghanistan. Then he would go and attack Shambhaji. Recalling Amir Khan would result in the loss of the territory. So it would fall under the control of Afghanistan’s enemies.
It became clear that none of his allies were ready to confront Shambhaji. In a hopeless situation, Aurangzeb temporarily abandoned his attempt to attack Maharashtra.
Aurangazeb captured Bijapur and Golconda
In this, he tried to subdue the sultans of Bijapur and Golconda for three years. So this was a good opportunity for Shambhaji. But Shambhaji did not make much effort to profit from it. Shambhaji focused on reorganizing his internal administration. Thinking that he would see if Aurangzeb attacked him.
That time, Aurangzeb noticed this situation. Here he took the initiative to take advantage. He moved his army. So he attacked the parts of Maharashtra that were Hindu Swaraj. Finally, the Mughal soldiers took control of Khandesh and Konkan.
However, Aurangzeb knew that Shambhaji’s survival stood in the way of his conquest of Maharashtra. So Sambhaji excelled in the struggle for independence.
Sambhaji always thinks like Shivaji?
Only by capturing and converting Sambhaji to his side. But he would make the expansion of the Mughal empire in the south and Maharashtra possible. He thought of a strategy to capture Sambhaji. But again, Sambhaji did not think comprehensively like Shivaji.
The ministers, soldiers, and people should have ascended the throne with the consent of all. But since Sambhaji ascended the throne immediately after Shivaji died. So not everything is known to Sambhaji.
Aurangazeb continuous attack
Sambhaji spent his time in continuous wars with Aurangzeb. Regardless of the experienced elders who worked for Shivaji. Since he was a brave warrior, he easily faced Aurangzeb. Due to Shivaji, he established a good system.
Continuously, Shambhaji regretted his unilateral decisions. Danger had already loomed. He bravely refused Aurangzeb’s order.Aurangzeb became angry. He tied his legs and arms tightly and completely restrained him. So he ordered their chief to bring Shambhaji before him. After capture, he tortured him repeatedly and repeatedly to convert to Islam.
Sacrifice
Shambhaji, while enduring the pain, smiled and defied Aurangzeb. Then he defiantly proclaimed his fearlessness in the face of death. So Aurangzeb’s anger reached its peak. Aurangzeb’s men brutally tortured him for 40 days.
They ripped out his eyeballs and tore off his nails. Then savagely peeled off his skin while he was still alive. He asked if he would convert to Islam. He promised to give me his daughter’s hand in marriage. He also assured me that he would not convert to Islam. That he would not capture even a single fort.
Death
Sambhaji roared with the courage of a lion. Finally, in 1689, he died. A magnificent memorial has now been built at that place, inspiring everyone.
Thus, Sambhaji died a heroic death. And thereafter, the Maratha people reunified. The land that gave birth to many such heroes is ours… Jai Sambhaji Jai Hindu Rashtra.
Winston Churchill Life Story | Winsten Churchill Quotes
/0 Comments/in Famous Rivalries & Comparisons, Historical & Political Figures/by rathodkethan1@gmail.comWinston Churchill was responsible for more than 3 million deaths in India and used to hate Indians.

Winston Churchill: The War Leader Who Defined an Era
Winston Churchill led Britain with strength and determination. But there is also a dark chapter related to Churchill’s rule in the colonial history of Britain. Here, this is directly related to India.
The twentieth century has faced the horrific situations of two terrible world wars. During both wars, the whole world faced a horrific reality where it could turn into a heap of ashes. Alternatively, it risked establishing a ruthless empire of dictators. Where the dark sheet of intentions of dictators like Hitler and Mussolini was trying to capture the world.
Britain's hero and India's villain
While Churchill is a hero in Britain, he played a villainous role in India. He looked like a leader who fought and defeated a powerful dictator like Hitler.
Birth
Winston Churchill was born in 1874 in Oxfordshire, UK. Winston Churchill served as a skilled and influential politician, writer, skilled administrator, and military officer.
Many famous people of the 20th century saw Churchill’s character as a mix of strengths and flaws. Due to Churchill’s policies in Britain, there was a severe famine in Bengal during the British rule in India.
This is how he became the villain of India

Many books reveal that Churchill held negative views about India. These books clearly show Churchill’s negative views about Indians. During the British rule in India, even the British officers often disagreed with Churchill’s decisions for India.
But the system also forced them to comply. According to the data, in the year 1943, when people in Bengal were suffering from hunger. Even then, enough. India is the top producer of rice.
Why Churchill as India villain
During the Second World War, the British exported grains on a large scale for the soldiers. But the British officers hoarded grains on a large scale for their soldiers stationed in India.
Due to which there was a shortage of grains, and the weather also played spoilsport. During that time, Indians labeled Churchill the villain of India. Because he did not try to stop the deaths. So this is due to starvation in India.
How millions of indian died ?
However, when the situation of starvation in India became dire. So countries like Canada and America offered to supply grains. But British PM Winston Churchill did not make any decision.
He diverted the ship that went for help from Australia and called it to Europe. Due to this step of Churchill, more than 3 million people died of starvation in West Bengal, Bangladesh, Odisha, and Bihar.
Winston Churchill on Bengal Crisis
There is no doubt that people see him as a strong leader in Britain. But in Britain’s colonial history, a dark chapter also got committed under his rule. So this directly affected India.
The people of India consider Churchill responsible for the deaths of millions due to hunger in Bengal in 1943. Most historians of the country also hold him accountable for this tragedy.
According to an estimate, more than 3 million people died due to lack of food in this famine. Most historians believe that Churchill’s policies caused this to happen. Otherwise, proper actions could have prevented many deaths.
Shashi Taroor comment on Winston Churchill
Many historians, as well as Congress party leader Shashi Tharoor, consistently blame Winston Churchill for millions of deaths. He condemned Churchill for the famine in 1943.
Once Shashi Tharoor said in his speech in Britain, “Mr. Churchill needs to be studied in depth. His hands are as bloody as Hitler’s, especially because of the decisions that led to the terrible food crisis of Bengal in 1943-44, in which 43 lakh people died.”
Winston Churchill over Women enforcement for prostitution
Historians report that economic hardship forced many women into prostitution to support their families. This desperate measure was often taken to ensure their children’s survival.
In other parts of the country too, the authorities withheld food grain supplies under the pretext of famine. Because in reality, the then PM of Britain, Winston Churchill, did not want India to ever become independent. He wanted to exploit the Indians.
How wrong Winston Churchill was about India
A controversy recently erupted in Britain earlier this month. So labour leader John McDonnell sparked the debate by criticizing Winston Churchill. Here McDonnell condemned Churchill’s decision in 1910 to order security forces to fire on striking workers.
His political opponents attacked him savagely. Then Sir Nicholas Soames defended his grandfather Winston Churchill’s reputation, stating that a cheap politician seeking attention couldn’t tarnish it.
Continuously, he actively shielded Churchill’s legacy from criticism, asserting its endurance against any attacks. Then he actively shielded Churchill’s legacy, believing it could withstand any criticism. I don’t think it will cause a stir in the world.”
Churchill decisions against Nazis
As far as Britain is concerned, this may be true. But Churchill stood up to the Nazis, earning him reverence for his courageous stance. when none of his party colleagues were willing to.
Police firing caused an isolated death, which seems insignificant compared to the numerous deaths. He suffered defending his country during World War II. Critics in India have actively targeted Churchill’s reputation, condemning his actions and views on the country.
Hatrate towards Gandhi
His expressed disdain for Indians widely condemned Churchill for calling Indians “a beastly people” with “a beastly religion.”. His hatred of Gandhi and his refusal to give food aid to the starving peasants of Bengal are well known. strong basis for impeachment against him is a document I recently obtained from the archives.
He said that in any case, British rule in India should continue indefinitely. So he expressed his discontent with the term “Dominion Status.”. He felt that its usage was incorrect and led to misunderstandings.
Death
Churchill wrote that ‘it is wrong for the highest servants of the Crown. Whether ministers, viceroys, or governors, to use the term or to raise hopes by it. Unless they are certain that it will become a reality in a certain time.
Churchill envisions India as a self-governing unit, similar to Canada or Australia. He can achieve this goal, but only in a hundred or two hundred years.
However, if this is indeed his intention, he should explicitly state that it’s a long-term objective. Using the term without clarification may lead to misunderstandings.Churchill died in 1965 in London.
Sambhaji Maharaj Biography
/0 Comments/in Biographies & Life Stories, Historical & Political Figures/by rathodkethan1@gmail.comSambhaji Maharaj, who did not convert even after being tortured and having his body cut into pieces

Sambhaji Maharaj Chhaava movie
For 9 years, Sambhaji Maharaj also fought like his father. This film Chava is based on the life of the second ruler of the Maratha Empire. So the son of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj is doing well at the box office.
In this, Vicky Kaushal’s performance brings the character of Shambhaji to life. Greatly, Director Laxman Utekar made this film to touch the hearts of the audience. This film has also received critical acclaim and praise on social media.
Sambhaji maharaj converted into Islam ?
So Shambhaji led many military campaigns. The most important of which was the attack on Burhanpur under the Mughal rule. Then he rejected Aurangzeb’s offer to leave him if he converted to Hinduism. But he preferred to sacrifice his life for Hinduism. He refused to back down even in adverse situations.
Now, Shambhaji was also a researcher. While fighting tirelessly to save the kingdom, on the other hand. Here he became proficient in several languages. So much so, he gave priority to education and science.
Sambhaji Maharaj strength
A lot—we can learn a great deal from his innovative war strategies and leadership. Adhering to the ideology he believed in, the sacrifices he made for the people. And the loyalty he showed to them is indescribable.
Above all, his determination, discipline, and self-reliance remain an inspiration to today’s generation. His life shows that true strength lies not in power alone. But in personality and perseverance.
Aurangazeb dream to Islam India
Being king, Aurangzeb’s dream was to convert Hindu India into an Islamic country. Many people had tried this before him. They did not succeed. Mostly, Shaista Khan, Diler Khan, Dawood Khan, Mahabat Khan, and Bahadur Khan—Marathas defeated all his brave soldiers and subedars.
Hundreds of soldiers and chieftains died in various battles. 50–60 thousand soldiers died. So the Marathas/British/East India Company destroyed the prestige of the Delhi-Mughal empire. Finely, Aurangzeb himself thought of going to the south many times.But he refrained from it due to fear for his life (security issue).
Sambhaji Maharaj maintain Hind Swaraj
During Shivaji’s presence, he trembled with fear. Then, defeat, he thought, would cost him his honor. With the death of Shivaji in 1680, the fear disappeared. A good opportunity came.
For a long time, Shivaji consolidated Hindu Swaraj and gained great prestige. In this race, Shambhaji could not maintain it well. But Shivaji brought great honor to the Hindu throne. Shambhaji earned a reputation as a great warrior.
Sambhaji maharaj protest women

His whole life, Shambhaji showed his anger to the Mughal rulers. And he fiercely defended Hindu women against Mughal atrocities. So he took the responsibility of saving the honor and lives of Hindu women. Mostly those who were facing severe troubles due to the Mughals.
None of Aurangzeb’s chieftains and soldiers came forward to confront Shambhaji. Such was the valor of Shambhaji. Aurangzeb asked his eldest son to go and attack Shambhaji.
What happened to Aurangazeb son?
Here he conditioned that Amir Khan must accompany the army to Afghanistan. Then he would go and attack Shambhaji. Recalling Amir Khan would result in the loss of the territory. So it would fall under the control of Afghanistan’s enemies.
It became clear that none of his allies were ready to confront Shambhaji. In a hopeless situation, Aurangzeb temporarily abandoned his attempt to attack Maharashtra.
Aurangazeb captured Bijapur and Golconda
In this, he tried to subdue the sultans of Bijapur and Golconda for three years. So this was a good opportunity for Shambhaji. But Shambhaji did not make much effort to profit from it. Shambhaji focused on reorganizing his internal administration. Thinking that he would see if Aurangzeb attacked him.
That time, Aurangzeb noticed this situation. Here he took the initiative to take advantage. He moved his army. So he attacked the parts of Maharashtra that were Hindu Swaraj. Finally, the Mughal soldiers took control of Khandesh and Konkan.
However, Aurangzeb knew that Shambhaji’s survival stood in the way of his conquest of Maharashtra. So Sambhaji excelled in the struggle for independence.
Sambhaji always thinks like Shivaji?
Only by capturing and converting Sambhaji to his side. But he would make the expansion of the Mughal empire in the south and Maharashtra possible. He thought of a strategy to capture Sambhaji. But again, Sambhaji did not think comprehensively like Shivaji.
The ministers, soldiers, and people should have ascended the throne with the consent of all. But since Sambhaji ascended the throne immediately after Shivaji died. So not everything is known to Sambhaji.
Aurangazeb continuous attack
Sambhaji spent his time in continuous wars with Aurangzeb. Regardless of the experienced elders who worked for Shivaji. Since he was a brave warrior, he easily faced Aurangzeb. Due to Shivaji, he established a good system.
Continuously, Shambhaji regretted his unilateral decisions. Danger had already loomed. He bravely refused Aurangzeb’s order.Aurangzeb became angry. He tied his legs and arms tightly and completely restrained him. So he ordered their chief to bring Shambhaji before him. After capture, he tortured him repeatedly and repeatedly to convert to Islam.
Sacrifice
Shambhaji, while enduring the pain, smiled and defied Aurangzeb. Then he defiantly proclaimed his fearlessness in the face of death. So Aurangzeb’s anger reached its peak. Aurangzeb’s men brutally tortured him for 40 days.
They ripped out his eyeballs and tore off his nails. Then savagely peeled off his skin while he was still alive. He asked if he would convert to Islam. He promised to give me his daughter’s hand in marriage. He also assured me that he would not convert to Islam. That he would not capture even a single fort.
Death
Sambhaji roared with the courage of a lion. Finally, in 1689, he died. A magnificent memorial has now been built at that place, inspiring everyone.
Thus, Sambhaji died a heroic death. And thereafter, the Maratha people reunified. The land that gave birth to many such heroes is ours… Jai Sambhaji Jai Hindu Rashtra.
Winston Churchill Life Story | Winsten Churchill Quotes
/0 Comments/in Famous Rivalries & Comparisons, Historical & Political Figures/by rathodkethan1@gmail.comWinston Churchill was responsible for more than 3 million deaths in India and used to hate Indians.

Winston Churchill: The War Leader Who Defined an Era
Winston Churchill led Britain with strength and determination. But there is also a dark chapter related to Churchill’s rule in the colonial history of Britain. Here, this is directly related to India.
The twentieth century has faced the horrific situations of two terrible world wars. During both wars, the whole world faced a horrific reality where it could turn into a heap of ashes. Alternatively, it risked establishing a ruthless empire of dictators. Where the dark sheet of intentions of dictators like Hitler and Mussolini was trying to capture the world.
Britain's hero and India's villain
While Churchill is a hero in Britain, he played a villainous role in India. He looked like a leader who fought and defeated a powerful dictator like Hitler.
Birth
Winston Churchill was born in 1874 in Oxfordshire, UK. Winston Churchill served as a skilled and influential politician, writer, skilled administrator, and military officer.
Many famous people of the 20th century saw Churchill’s character as a mix of strengths and flaws. Due to Churchill’s policies in Britain, there was a severe famine in Bengal during the British rule in India.
This is how he became the villain of India

Many books reveal that Churchill held negative views about India. These books clearly show Churchill’s negative views about Indians. During the British rule in India, even the British officers often disagreed with Churchill’s decisions for India.
But the system also forced them to comply. According to the data, in the year 1943, when people in Bengal were suffering from hunger. Even then, enough. India is the top producer of rice.
Why Churchill as India villain
During the Second World War, the British exported grains on a large scale for the soldiers. But the British officers hoarded grains on a large scale for their soldiers stationed in India.
Due to which there was a shortage of grains, and the weather also played spoilsport. During that time, Indians labeled Churchill the villain of India. Because he did not try to stop the deaths. So this is due to starvation in India.
How millions of indian died ?
However, when the situation of starvation in India became dire. So countries like Canada and America offered to supply grains. But British PM Winston Churchill did not make any decision.
He diverted the ship that went for help from Australia and called it to Europe. Due to this step of Churchill, more than 3 million people died of starvation in West Bengal, Bangladesh, Odisha, and Bihar.
Winston Churchill on Bengal Crisis
There is no doubt that people see him as a strong leader in Britain. But in Britain’s colonial history, a dark chapter also got committed under his rule. So this directly affected India.
The people of India consider Churchill responsible for the deaths of millions due to hunger in Bengal in 1943. Most historians of the country also hold him accountable for this tragedy.
According to an estimate, more than 3 million people died due to lack of food in this famine. Most historians believe that Churchill’s policies caused this to happen. Otherwise, proper actions could have prevented many deaths.
Shashi Taroor comment on Winston Churchill
Many historians, as well as Congress party leader Shashi Tharoor, consistently blame Winston Churchill for millions of deaths. He condemned Churchill for the famine in 1943.
Once Shashi Tharoor said in his speech in Britain, “Mr. Churchill needs to be studied in depth. His hands are as bloody as Hitler’s, especially because of the decisions that led to the terrible food crisis of Bengal in 1943-44, in which 43 lakh people died.”
Winston Churchill over Women enforcement for prostitution
Historians report that economic hardship forced many women into prostitution to support their families. This desperate measure was often taken to ensure their children’s survival.
In other parts of the country too, the authorities withheld food grain supplies under the pretext of famine. Because in reality, the then PM of Britain, Winston Churchill, did not want India to ever become independent. He wanted to exploit the Indians.
How wrong Winston Churchill was about India
A controversy recently erupted in Britain earlier this month. So labour leader John McDonnell sparked the debate by criticizing Winston Churchill. Here McDonnell condemned Churchill’s decision in 1910 to order security forces to fire on striking workers.
His political opponents attacked him savagely. Then Sir Nicholas Soames defended his grandfather Winston Churchill’s reputation, stating that a cheap politician seeking attention couldn’t tarnish it.
Continuously, he actively shielded Churchill’s legacy from criticism, asserting its endurance against any attacks. Then he actively shielded Churchill’s legacy, believing it could withstand any criticism. I don’t think it will cause a stir in the world.”
Churchill decisions against Nazis
As far as Britain is concerned, this may be true. But Churchill stood up to the Nazis, earning him reverence for his courageous stance. when none of his party colleagues were willing to.
Police firing caused an isolated death, which seems insignificant compared to the numerous deaths. He suffered defending his country during World War II. Critics in India have actively targeted Churchill’s reputation, condemning his actions and views on the country.
Hatrate towards Gandhi
His expressed disdain for Indians widely condemned Churchill for calling Indians “a beastly people” with “a beastly religion.”. His hatred of Gandhi and his refusal to give food aid to the starving peasants of Bengal are well known. strong basis for impeachment against him is a document I recently obtained from the archives.
He said that in any case, British rule in India should continue indefinitely. So he expressed his discontent with the term “Dominion Status.”. He felt that its usage was incorrect and led to misunderstandings.
Death
Churchill wrote that ‘it is wrong for the highest servants of the Crown. Whether ministers, viceroys, or governors, to use the term or to raise hopes by it. Unless they are certain that it will become a reality in a certain time.
Churchill envisions India as a self-governing unit, similar to Canada or Australia. He can achieve this goal, but only in a hundred or two hundred years.
However, if this is indeed his intention, he should explicitly state that it’s a long-term objective. Using the term without clarification may lead to misunderstandings.Churchill died in 1965 in London.