Winston Churchill Life Story | Winsten Churchill Quotes
Winston Churchill was responsible for more than 3 million deaths in India and used to hate Indians.
Winston Churchill: The War Leader Who Defined an Era
Winston Churchill led Britain with strength and determination. But there is also a dark chapter related to Churchill’s rule in the colonial history of Britain. Here, this is directly related to India.
The twentieth century has faced the horrific situations of two terrible world wars. During both wars, the whole world faced a horrific reality where it could turn into a heap of ashes. Alternatively, it risked establishing a ruthless empire of dictators. Where the dark sheet of intentions of dictators like Hitler and Mussolini was trying to capture the world.
Britain's hero and India's villain
While Churchill is a hero in Britain, he played a villainous role in India. He looked like a leader who fought and defeated a powerful dictator like Hitler.
Birth
Winston Churchill was born in 1874 in Oxfordshire, UK. Winston Churchill served as a skilled and influential politician, writer, skilled administrator, and military officer.
Many famous people of the 20th century saw Churchill’s character as a mix of strengths and flaws. Due to Churchill’s policies in Britain, there was a severe famine in Bengal during the British rule in India.
This is how he became the villain of India
Many books reveal that Churchill held negative views about India. These books clearly show Churchill’s negative views about Indians. During the British rule in India, even the British officers often disagreed with Churchill’s decisions for India.
But the system also forced them to comply. According to the data, in the year 1943, when people in Bengal were suffering from hunger. Even then, enough. India is the top producer of rice.
Why Churchill as India villain
During the Second World War, the British exported grains on a large scale for the soldiers. But the British officers hoarded grains on a large scale for their soldiers stationed in India.
Due to which there was a shortage of grains, and the weather also played spoilsport. During that time, Indians labeled Churchill the villain of India. Because he did not try to stop the deaths. So this is due to starvation in India.
How millions of indian died ?
However, when the situation of starvation in India became dire. So countries like Canada and America offered to supply grains. But British PM Winston Churchill did not make any decision.
He diverted the ship that went for help from Australia and called it to Europe. Due to this step of Churchill, more than 3 million people died of starvation in West Bengal, Bangladesh, Odisha, and Bihar.
Winston Churchill on Bengal Crisis
There is no doubt that people see him as a strong leader in Britain. But in Britain’s colonial history, a dark chapter also got committed under his rule. So this directly affected India.
The people of India consider Churchill responsible for the deaths of millions due to hunger in Bengal in 1943. Most historians of the country also hold him accountable for this tragedy.
According to an estimate, more than 3 million people died due to lack of food in this famine. Most historians believe that Churchill’s policies caused this to happen. Otherwise, proper actions could have prevented many deaths.
Shashi Taroor comment on Winston Churchill
Many historians, as well as Congress party leader Shashi Tharoor, consistently blame Winston Churchill for millions of deaths. He condemned Churchill for the famine in 1943.
Once Shashi Tharoor said in his speech in Britain, “Mr. Churchill needs to be studied in depth. His hands are as bloody as Hitler’s, especially because of the decisions that led to the terrible food crisis of Bengal in 1943-44, in which 43 lakh people died.”
Winston Churchill over Women enforcement for prostitution
Historians report that economic hardship forced many women into prostitution to support their families. This desperate measure was often taken to ensure their children’s survival.
In other parts of the country too, the authorities withheld food grain supplies under the pretext of famine. Because in reality, the then PM of Britain, Winston Churchill, did not want India to ever become independent. He wanted to exploit the Indians.
How wrong Winston Churchill was about India
A controversy recently erupted in Britain earlier this month. So labour leader John McDonnell sparked the debate by criticizing Winston Churchill. Here McDonnell condemned Churchill’s decision in 1910 to order security forces to fire on striking workers.
His political opponents attacked him savagely. Then Sir Nicholas Soames defended his grandfather Winston Churchill’s reputation, stating that a cheap politician seeking attention couldn’t tarnish it.
Continuously, he actively shielded Churchill’s legacy from criticism, asserting its endurance against any attacks. Then he actively shielded Churchill’s legacy, believing it could withstand any criticism. I don’t think it will cause a stir in the world.”
Churchill decisions against Nazis
As far as Britain is concerned, this may be true. But Churchill stood up to the Nazis, earning him reverence for his courageous stance. when none of his party colleagues were willing to.
Police firing caused an isolated death, which seems insignificant compared to the numerous deaths. He suffered defending his country during World War II. Critics in India have actively targeted Churchill’s reputation, condemning his actions and views on the country.
Hatrate towards Gandhi
His expressed disdain for Indians widely condemned Churchill for calling Indians “a beastly people” with “a beastly religion.”. His hatred of Gandhi and his refusal to give food aid to the starving peasants of Bengal are well known. strong basis for impeachment against him is a document I recently obtained from the archives.
He said that in any case, British rule in India should continue indefinitely. So he expressed his discontent with the term “Dominion Status.”. He felt that its usage was incorrect and led to misunderstandings.
Death
Churchill wrote that ‘it is wrong for the highest servants of the Crown. Whether ministers, viceroys, or governors, to use the term or to raise hopes by it. Unless they are certain that it will become a reality in a certain time.
Churchill envisions India as a self-governing unit, similar to Canada or Australia. He can achieve this goal, but only in a hundred or two hundred years.
However, if this is indeed his intention, he should explicitly state that it’s a long-term objective. Using the term without clarification may lead to misunderstandings.Churchill died in 1965 in London.
